MaxDiff vs Conjoint Analysis: Which Should I Use?
Savannah Trotter • 22 Jun 2022
If you've worked in the insights space for long, you’re likely familiar with both conjoint and maxdiff analysis. They are widely used across market research, most often for product and message testing.
And while both can help you to better understand what consumers value most about your product or service, each has a unique approach and output that can be beneficial depending upon your use case.
So today, we'll explore what each of these experiments can help you accomplish, how they are similar, what makes them different, and which you should choose for your specific use case!
Before we dive in, let’s cover a few terms we’ll use throughout this piece:
Attributes- Also known as the features of a product or service. These are the aspects of your offering that will be evaluated in a maxdiff or conjoint analysis. For example, the attributes of a pre-packaged cold brew product could be price, flavor, packaging sustainability, or the amount of caffeine.
Levels- These are simply the options related to each attribute that you will be testing. Continuing the example above, the levels of our flavor attribute could be plain, vanilla, or hazelnut.
Profile or Card- This is the hypothetical product (or service) offering generated during a conjoint experiment. It’s the total package of your attributes with randomized levels displayed. Below is a sample profile for our cold brew product:
What are Conjoint & MaxDiff Analysis?
Conjoint Analysis
In market research, a conjoint analysis is a technique used to measure the value of your product's features- both individually and as a package.
It does this by giving respondents a choice between 2-3 profiles, each with the same attributes but with randomized levels. Using our cold brew product; a question from a conjoint analysis exploring price, packaging sustainability, flavor, and the amount of caffeine would look something like this:
MaxDiff Analysis
On the other hand, MaxDiff analysis allows respondents to quantify their preferences by rating your product’s attributes as least or most important to them. A sample question from a MaxDiff exploring similar attributes of our cold brew product might look something like this:
How are MaxDiff and Conjoint Similar? And How Are They Different?
Similarities
Both Conjoint and MaxDiff analysis force respondents to make tradeoffs, simulating a real-world buying decision. While each experiment has its own way of doing this, they will both give you a better understanding of which attributes are most important to your audience.
Differences
The output of a MaxDiff will show you a ranking of your attributes from best to worst. This gives you a quick and easy way to understand which individual features are the most valuable to consumers and which matter least.
On the other hand, the output from a conjoint analysis will not only show you the importance of each attribute but also the popularity of each level within your attributes. Ultimately this will help you to better understand the optimal package to capture the largest market share.
So, the next time you're trying to evaluate which methodology is right for your use case, just think about your goals:
IF you’re looking to better understand your product’s attributes individually, we’d suggest a MaxDiff.
Alternatively...
IF you're interested in finding the best overall package of attributes for your product, we'd suggest a conjoint.
And if you need a little guidance to get you started with either of these techniques, check out our blog on MaxDiff Analysis or these expert tips on conjoint analysis!
Automated MaxDiff & Conjoint Analysis with SightX
The SightX platform is the next generation of automated market research tools: a single, unified solution for consumer engagement, understanding, advanced analysis, and reporting. Allowing insights, marketing, and CX teams to start, optimize, and scale their insights workflow.
Remove the guesswork from your current insights strategy by going directly to the source. Reach out today to start a trial, or let us know what you need and we’ll set up a tailored platform demo!
Meet the author
Savannah Trotter
Generative AI is Here to Push the Limits of Market Research
While the technology of generative AI has been around for quite some time, it wasn’t until the introduction of Lindsay • 30 Sep 2024
Consumer Spending Outlook: Summer 2024
Despite most economic indicators showing the US economy is in good shape by historical standards, consumer confidence has begun to dip once again, Savannah Trotter • 11 Jul 2024
How to Write Effective Concept Testing Survey Questions
Your concept tests are only as good as the questions you include. When done correctly, Savannah Trotter • 07 Jun 2024
Concept Validation Strategies and Methods
When you're ready to validate a new idea, Naira Musallam, PhD • 22 May 2024
Data Privacy & Generative AI in Market Research
In the digital age, data privacy and security are paramount, especially when utilizing powerful generative AI tools, like our Lindsay • 05 Apr 2024
Unleashing the Power of Survey Pages with Randomization and Looping
When designing a The SightX Research Team • 27 Mar 2024
Meet the author
Savannah Trotter
Ready to meet the next generation of consumer research technology?
The Future of Consumer Research