BlogBlog Details page
Research Resources

Open-ended vs. Closed Questions in User Research

Naira Musallam, PhD • 4 Nov 2024

In user research, questions are at the heart of every study, guiding the data we collect and shaping the insights we uncover. The type of questions we ask can significantly influence the direction and depth of our findings. Two of the most common question types in user research—open-ended and closed questions—play distinct yet complementary roles.

In this blog, we’ll cover the key differences between open-ended and closed questions, when to use each type, how they impact data analysis, and best practices for formulating questions that maximize the effectiveness of your research. Whether you’re designing surveys, conducting interviews, or gathering feedback through usability testing, understanding these question types will help you gather richer, more actionable insights.

What are Open-ended Questions?

Open-ended questions are those that encourage respondents to share their thoughts, feelings, and opinions in their own words, without being restricted to specific options. These questions allow users to express themselves freely, providing insights that go beyond quantitative measures.

Examples of Open-ended Questions:

  1. “What do you like about this product?”
  2. “How does this feature help you in your daily tasks?”
  3. “Can you describe a time when you found this tool helpful?”

Advantages of Open-ended Questions:

  1. Deeper insights and emotions: Open-ended questions reveal the underlying motivations, feelings, and perceptions of users, providing a window into the “why” behind their behaviors.
  2. Encourages creativity: Users can share unique opinions, which can uncover novel ideas or highlight issues that may not have been previously considered.
  3.  Identifies unmet needs: Open-ended responses often highlight pain points or unaddressed user needs, which can be valuable for product development and improvement.

Challenges of Open-ended Questions:

  1. Time-consuming to analyze: Because responses vary in length and content, analyzing open-ended questions typically requires qualitative coding or text analysis, which can be labor-intensive.
  2. Risk of Irrelevance: Respondents may go off-topic or provide information unrelated to the question, making it challenging to derive consistent insights.

What are Closed Questions?

In contrast, closed questions are structured to limit the range of responses to predefined options, such as yes/no answers, scales, or multiple-choice options. This type of question is designed to yield quantitative data that can be easily compared and analyzed.

Examples of Closed Questions:

  1. “On a scale of 1-10, how satisfied are you with this feature?”
  2. “Would you recommend this product to others? Yes/No.”
  3. “How often do you use this feature? (Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never)”

Advantages of Closed Questions:

  1. Easier to Analyze: Since responses are standardized, data from closed questions can be easily quantified, visualized, and statistically analyzed.
  2. Ideal for Comparisons: Closed questions allow researchers to make direct comparisons across respondents, making it easier to identify trends and commonalities.
  3. Reduces Ambiguity: With a limited set of answers, closed questions provide clarity and structure, minimizing the risk of misinterpretation.

Challenges of Closed Questions:

  1. Limits Depth of Insight: Closed questions restrict responses, which can prevent users from fully expressing their thoughts and feelings.
  2.  Misses Nuances: Without the option to elaborate, subtle but important details may be overlooked.

When to Use Open-ended Questions vs. Closed Questions

The choice between open-ended and closed questions should align with your research goals and the type of information you want to gather.

Exploratory Research: When the goal is to explore new topics, understand behaviors, or uncover unmet needs, open-ended questions are invaluable. They allow respondents to speak freely, revealing insights you might not anticipate. This is especially useful in the early stages of research, where qualitative insights can inform more targeted, quantitative questions later on.

For example: “What are the most frustrating features about this product?” This question invites a range of responses that can highlight various pain points, which can later inform a structured survey or usability test.

Quantitative Measurement: If you need measurable data points or seek to make comparisons across a sample, closed questions are a better choice. They allow you to gather data quickly and make it easier to quantify opinions, attitudes, and behaviors across a larger group.

For example: “On a scale of 1-10, how likely are you to recommend this product to a friend?” This question yields numeric data that can be statistically analyzed, making it easier to measure overall satisfaction levels.

Mixed-Methods Approach: In many cases, a combination of open-ended and closed questions is ideal. For example, you might start with a closed question to gauge satisfaction levels, followed by an open-ended question that allows respondents to elaborate on their ratings. This approach combines the structure of quantitative data with the depth of qualitative insights, providing a more complete picture of user opinions.

Examples of Combining Open and Closed Questions in User Research 

To illustrate how open and closed questions can complement each other, let’s look at a sample survey:

  1. Closed Question: “How often do you use this feature? (Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never)”
  2. Follow-up Open-ended Question: “What do you like or dislike about using this feature?”

In this example, the closed question provides a quantitative measure of usage frequency, which is helpful for identifying user patterns. The follow-up open-ended question, on the other hand, captures subjective feedback on the feature, allowing for deeper insights that could inform future improvements.

Using a mix of question types like this helps to balance the need for actionable data with the richness of user feedback. You get the best of both worlds: structured data for easy analysis and open responses for richer understanding.

Best Practices for Formulating Open-ended and Closed Questions 

For Open-ended Questions:

  • Keep questions neutral: Avoid leading questions that might bias responses. Instead, use neutral wording that encourages honest feedback. For example, instead of asking, “What’s your biggest problem with this product?” try “What’s your experience been using this product?”
  • Encourage elaboration: If possible, include prompts like “Tell us more” or “Can you describe an example?” to encourage detailed responses.
  • Limit to key topics: Because open-ended questions are more time-intensive to answer, use them sparingly, focusing only on the areas where deeper insight is needed.

For Closed Questions:

  • Provide clear, exhaustive options: Ensure response options cover all possible answers and that they are mutually exclusive. For example, if asking about usage frequency, avoid overlapping categories like “Monthly” and “Weekly to Monthly.”
  • Use consistent scales: For questions that require a rating scale, use a consistent scale (e.g., 1-10 or 1-5) across the survey to reduce confusion and improve comparability.
  • Randomize choices (if applicable): When using closed questions with multiple-choice options, randomize the order to avoid bias that may occur if users consistently select the first or last option.

The Impact of Question Type on Data Analysis

The type of questions you choose affects not only the depth and scope of insights but also the ease and approach to data analysis.

Qualitative data analysis for open-ended questions: Analyzing open-ended responses requires more effort and may involve qualitative coding, where responses are grouped into themes. Tools like thematic analysis, sentiment analysis, or natural language processing (NLP) can help uncover patterns, but these methods are more time-consuming. Open-ended data is rich in context and depth, making it invaluable for discovering nuanced user insights, though it often requires skilled analysts or specialized software to interpret.

Quantitative data analysis for closed questions: Closed questions, on the other hand, yield structured data that can be quickly analyzed using statistical tools, making them ideal for generating dashboards, charts, and reports. Quantitative analysis allows you to spot trends, make comparisons, and track changes over time. For example, closed-question responses can be easily visualized in bar charts or line graphs, offering an at-a-glance view of user preferences and behavior.

Combining both analysis types often provides the most comprehensive understanding of user needs and experiences.

Conclusion

Open-ended and closed questions each have distinct strengths and limitations. Open-ended questions bring richness and depth, uncovering the nuances behind user opinions and behaviors, while closed questions provide structure and measurability, allowing for easy comparison and statistical analysis. In user research, the choice between the two should align with your goals: use open-ended questions to explore, and closed questions to quantify.

A mixed-methods approach that leverages both question types often yields the most comprehensive insights, combining the precision of quantitative data with the depth of qualitative feedback. By carefully considering the purpose of each question and crafting it accordingly, you can design research that not only meets your data needs but also captures the full spectrum of user experiences.

Call to Action

Are you looking to refine your user research strategy? Consider how you can balance open-ended and closed questions in your next survey or interview. And if you need a powerful tool to help streamline your research and analysis, check out SightX for a solution that makes it easy to combine quantitative and qualitative insights.

 

Naira Musallam, PhD

Naira Musallam, PhD

Naira the co-founder of SightX and our in-house expert for all things research, statistics, and psychology. She received her doctorate from Columbia University, and served as faculty at both Columbia and NYU. She has over 15 years of experience in data analysis and research across multiple sectors in various industries.

Ready to meet the future of consumer research?

Reach out to get started

Request Demo
Twitter social

Ready to meet the next generation of consumer research technology?

The Future of Consumer Research